Why i will be believing that Anna Ardin is just a Liar 2020

Why i will be believing that Anna Ardin is just a Liar 2020

I will be somewhat updating and reposting this from 2012 as the main-stream news have actually guaranteed extremely few individuals understand the information associated with the “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought not to have now been arrested in britain in the beginning while there is no instance, with no investigation that is genuine. Check this out and also you will understand why.

One other thing perhaps maybe not commonly recognized will there be is not any JURY in a rape test in Sweden and it’s also a SECRET TEST. Every one of the proof, all the witnesses, are heard in key. No public, no jury, no news. The actual only real general public component is the charging and also the verdict. There is certainly a judge as well as 2 advisers straight appointed by governmental events. And that means you never ever would get to know exactly exactly just how clearly the full situation is a stitch-up. Unless you check this out.

You will find therefore numerous inconsistencies in Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. Nevertheless the key question which leaps away I have not seen asked anywhere else – is this at me– and which strangely:

Why did Anna Ardin perhaps perhaps not alert Sofia Wilen?

On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood when you look at the Swedish team around Assange for the shocking red cashmere sweater she had used within the front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange had been likely to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a pal who was simply in search of Assange:

“He’s maybe maybe maybe not right right here. He’s planned to possess intercourse with all the cashmere woman every night, yet not managed to get. Possibly he finally discovered time yesterday? ”

Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days earlier in the day, on 13 August, she was indeed intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault therefore serious she had been ready to take to (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s life that is entire. She has also been to mention that this attack included enforced sex that is unprotected she had been concerned with HIV.

If Ardin actually thought that on 13 August Assange had forced non-safe sex she make no attempt to warn Sofia Wilen that Wilen was in danger of her life on her and this could have transmitted HIV, why did? And just why ended up being Ardin speaking about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about any of it to buddies, without any disapproval that is evident discouragement?

Ardin had Wilen’s contact information and even had organised her enrollment for the press meeting. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.

Why don’t we fit that into a really brief survey associated with entire relationship that is ardin/Assange.

11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for the press seminar organised by a branch associated with Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat for him in which to stay as she’s going to be away.

13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s got supper with Assange and so they have actually consensual intercourse, regarding the day that is first of. Ardin later alleges this changed into assault by surreptitious mutilation associated with condom.

14 August: Anna volunteers to do something as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him regarding the dais at their press meeting. Assange fulfills Sofia Wilen there.

‘Julian desires to visit a party that is crayfish anyone have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’

This make an effort to locate a crayfish celebration fails, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that morning. Another offers to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick to me personally. ”

15 August Nevertheless during the party that is crayfish Julian, Anna tweets:

‘Sitting outside at 02:00 and barely freezing aided by the world’s coolest smartest people, it is amazing! #fb’

Julian and Anna, relating to both their authorities testimonies, rest once more in identical bed that is single and continue doing so for the following couple of days. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have sexual intercourse; Anna tells police they just do not. That Anna and Julian go together to, and leave together from, a dinner with the leadership of the Pirate Party evening. They again sleep when you look at the bed that is same.

16 August: Julian would go to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin will not alert her of prospective intimate attack. Another buddy provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once more declines.

20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say she actually is concerned about STD’s including HIV after non-safe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague on a single ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist officer, Irmeli Krans. Ardin tells Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to simply simply just take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s unrecorded – in breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a declaration Assange that is accusing of. Wilen will not signal it.

21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own authorities declaration alleging Assange has surreptiously had sex that is unprotected her eight days formerly.

Some times later on: Ardin creates a broken condom to your authorities as proof; but a forensic assessment discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA it is apparently unused on it, and indeed.

No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of intimate assault by Assange before Wilen’s Ardin-arranged meeting with Krans – and Wilen arrived forward to not ever grumble of a assault, but enquire about STDs. Wilen declined to signal the declaration rape that is alleging that was drafted by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.

It is simple this 1 of a couple of things took place:


Ardin had been intimately assaulted with unsafe sex, but did not alert Wilen when she knew Assange was going to see her in hope of intercourse.

Ardin also continued to host Assange, assist him, come in general public and private with him, work as his press assistant, and rest in identical sleep with him, refusing duplicated proposes to accommodate him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.


Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” came back home early after providing him the usage of her one sleep flat while she had been away. By her very own admission, she had consensual intercourse with him, within hours of fulfilling him. xxxstreams com

She talked about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and appears at the least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after non-safe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning feminist friend, policewoman Irmeli Krans, so that you can twist Wilen’s tale into a sexual assault – really easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape laws and regulations. Wilen declined to sign.

During the authorities place on 20 August, Wilen texted a buddy at 14.25 “did n’t need to put any costs against JA nevertheless the authorities wished to get a handle on him. ”

At 17.26 she texted because I only wanted him to take a test” that she was “shocked when they arrested JA.

The evening that is next 22.22 she texted “it had been law enforcement whom fabricated the charges”.

Ardin then constructed her story that is own of attack. As a lot of buddies knew she ended up being making love with Assange, she could perhaps maybe perhaps not claim non-consensual intercourse. Therefore she manufactured her tale to squeeze in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event associated with the condom that is torn. However the torn condom she produced does not have any trace of Assange onto it. It really is impractical to wear a condom rather than keep a DNA trace.


No difficulty is had by me in stating that We securely think Ardin to be always a liar. On her tale to be real involves acceptance of behavior which can be, into the literal feeling, amazing.

Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely poor, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you’re never ever designed to see all this work detail. Rape studies in Sweden take place totally in key. There is absolutely no jury, as well as the federal government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed directly by governmental events. If Assange visits Sweden, he can fade away into jail, the trial is likely to be key, as well as the the next thing you are going to hear is the fact that he could be bad and a rapist.

Secondly, needless to say, no matter the data is really so poor, as merely to cry rape would be to tarnish a reputation that is man’s. Anna Ardin has succeeded in destroying much of the ongoing work and life of Assange. The main points regarding the whole tale being pathetic is unimportant.

By crying rape, politically proper viewpoint falls in behind the line that it’s incorrect also to check out the data. If you should be perhaps not permitted to understand whom the accuser is, how will you discover that she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro teams in Havana and Miami?

Finally, to those helpful idiots whom declare that the best way to test these issues is in court, I would personally state needless to say, you’re appropriate, we have to trust the state constantly, fit-ups never happen, and now we should positively condemn the behaviour that is disgraceful of whom campaigned for the Birmingham Six.